The Velvet Sundown, an AI-generated band or clever streaming experiment?
With no clear origin and an unexpectedly large digital audience, The Velvet Sundown raises important questions about the role of artificial intelligence, curation, and authenticity in music consumption.
In recent months, a band called The Velvet Sundown has gained over 400,000 monthly Spotify listeners, appearing on editorial playlists and generating streams at a swift rate. On the surface, they’re presented as a four-piece psych-rock outfit blending cinematic alt-pop with dreamy, analogue-inspired soul. But there’s one potential problem, or rather, a growing number of them which is that no one seems to know who they actually are.
According to their Spotify profile, The Velvet Sundown is made up of members named Gabe Farrow, Lennie West, Milo Rains, and Orion “Rio” Del Mar. Their bio includes a glowing quote apparently from Billboard describing them as “the memory of something you never lived, and somehow make it feel real.” However, no one can find any record of Billboard publishing that quote. In fact, outside of Spotify, the band has virtually no digital footprint, no interviews, no social media accounts, no photoshoots, no live gig listings.
Music fans on Reddit and various forums quickly picked up on the strange lack of real-world evidence of the band’s existence. Some pointed out that the band photos on their profile look suspiciously AI-generated, slightly uncanny, with odd proportions and visual artifacts familiar to anyone who’s spent time around AI image generators.
Listeners also noticed that The Velvet Sundown’s tracks have been heavily playlisted on Spotify. They’ve appeared on several mood and era-themed playlists. The placement on these playlists has helped drive up stream counts rapidly, but it’s also raised eyebrows over how and why the tracks got there in the first place.
Theories about the band’s true nature are spreading fast. Some suggest it’s a label experiment in stealth marketing. Others think it’s a Spotify-driven test case for playlist performance or AI-generated music acceptance. The most widespread theory, though, is that The Velvet Sundown is an AI-generated music project, designed to sound human, presented with fabricated band personas, and then boosted via playlist placements.
The fact that none of the “band members” appear to exist on social media, and that none of the usual industry channels (press, radio, tour circuits) have any trace of the group, adds to the suspicion. The playlist strategy, combined with the eerie AI-style band photos and generic yet polished production style, ticks a lot of the boxes for something synthetic, built for streaming success rather than traditional artist development.
This isn’t the first time AI-generated artists have sparked debate on streaming platforms. Both Spotify and Deezer have recently acknowledged the growing presence of AI-made content in their catalogs. In some cases, this involves AI-assisted production tools, while in others, entire tracks (or projects) are generated with little to no human involvement. Both platforms have stated they’re working on better labeling and content transparency measures, but as of now, there’s no clear policy requiring artists, or AI projects posing as artists, to disclose their origins.
For Spotify users, the issue brings up broader questions about what exactly they’re listening to. Should listeners care if a song is AI-generated if it sounds good? Should streaming services label this content clearly? And at what point does this blur the line between curation and artificial manipulation of listening habits?
Whether The Velvet Sundown is a clever marketing experiment, an AI-generated streaming product, or something else entirely, the project has become part of a much bigger conversation about music, technology, and transparency in the streaming era.