Music Blog Submission Tracker for Independent Artists
Sending music to blogs and online publications can still help independent artists reach relevant listeners.
But emailing fifty websites without tracking the results is not a particularly good strategy.
You need to know:
Who did you contact?
What music do they cover?
When did you pitch?
Did anyone respond?
Was the campaign worth the effort?
A simple music blog submission tracker solves that problem.
Why use a tracker?
Music PR is a relationship-building activity.
A good tracker helps avoid:
- Sending duplicate pitches
- Contacting the wrong editor
- Missing deadlines
- Following up too often
- Forgetting previous conversations
- Losing useful coverage links
It also helps artists evaluate which publications are worth contacting again.
Build your spreadsheet
Start with these columns:
| Field | What to record |
|---|---|
| Publication | Blog or website name |
| Website | Publication URL |
| Contact | Editor or relevant writer |
| Verified contact information | |
| Genre | Styles regularly covered |
| Territory | Primary audience location |
| Submission status | Open, closed or uncertain |
| Last checked | Date contact information was verified |
| Pitch date | When you sent the music |
| Follow-up date | Any planned follow-up |
| Response | Accepted, declined or no reply |
| Coverage | Article or review URL |
| Notes | Useful context |
This is enough for most independent artists.
Find relevant publications
Don’t start with the largest possible list.
Start with publications that actually cover your genre.
Look at their recent articles.
Ask:
Have they covered similar artists?
Are they active?
Do they review independent releases?
Do they publish premieres or interviews?
Do they provide submission instructions?
Relevance matters more than the number of contacts.
Verify the information
Music blogs can change ownership, editors or submission policies.
Before adding a publication to your tracker, confirm that the contact information is current.
A directory published last year may still contain useful names.
But individual contacts should be checked before sending anything.
Score the opportunities
Use a simple one-to-five score.
You might evaluate:
Genre fit.
Audience relevance.
Editorial activity.
Ease of contact.
Likelihood of coverage.
A small specialist blog with an engaged audience may be more valuable than an enormous general-interest site that never features your style of music.
Personalise the pitch
Avoid sending the same generic message to everyone.
Explain why the music fits the publication.
Keep the message brief.
Include:
- Artist
- Track
- Release date
- Short description
- Listening link
- Press assets
Do not attach enormous files without being asked.
Track responses
After sending a pitch, update the spreadsheet.
Possible statuses include:
Not contacted.
Pitch sent.
Follow-up sent.
Interested.
Accepted.
Declined.
No response.
Coverage published.
This allows you to see the campaign clearly.
Follow up carefully
One polite follow-up can be appropriate.
But a journalist not responding does not mean they need repeated reminders.
Respect submission policies.
If the publication asks artists not to follow up, follow that instruction.
Measure results
Coverage is not only about collecting article links.
Look at:
- Referral traffic
- New followers
- Smart-link clicks
- Fan signups
- Streaming activity
- Useful industry relationships
Attribution will not always be precise.
But the data helps you understand what the campaign achieved.
Keep the list alive
After each campaign, update the tracker.
Remove inactive publications.
Correct outdated contacts.
Mark editors who changed roles.
Record which writers liked your music.
Over time, the tracker becomes more valuable than a static directory.
Final thoughts
Music PR works best when artists contact the right people with relevant music.
A tracker makes the process organised and repeatable.
Start with a small number of genuinely suitable publications, personalise the outreach and keep accurate records.
Twenty good contacts can be more useful than two hundred random emails.