{"id":106833,"date":"2026-01-20T09:39:23","date_gmt":"2026-01-20T09:39:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/routenote.com\/blog\/?p=106833"},"modified":"2026-01-20T09:39:25","modified_gmt":"2026-01-20T09:39:25","slug":"sweden-disqualifies-partly-ai-generated-song-from-official-charts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/routenote.com\/blog\/sweden-disqualifies-partly-ai-generated-song-from-official-charts\/","title":{"rendered":"Sweden disqualifies partly AI-generated folk-pop song from official charts despite Spotify success"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

As humans use AI as a tool in the creative process, Sweden\u2019s chart decision raises fresh questions about transparency around AI music.<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A partly AI-generated folk-pop song has been ruled ineligible for Sweden\u2019s official chart. Despite amassing millions of worldwide streams and topping Spotify\u2019s domestic rankings<\/a> in Sweden, it was barred from the chart after IFPI Sweden learned that elements of the track were partly AI-made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The track in the spotlight<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The song at the center of the controversy is \u201cI Know, You\u2019re Not Mine\u201d (\u201cJag Vet, Du \u00c4r Inte Min\u201d<\/a>) by Jacub. It sounds like a classic acoustic folk-pop song, with Jacub\u2019s artist profile page showing a sketched illustration of a bearded, t-shirt wearing man.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The track has racked up more than 6 million streams on Spotify<\/a> globally, including more than 200,000 plays in Sweden alone. It even topped Spotify\u2019s domestic charts. Yet now, it won\u2019t appear on Sweden\u2019s official chart, Sverigetopplistan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The chart is compiled by IFPI Sweden, and under its current rules, Jacob\u2019s track doesn\u2019t make the cut.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As an IFPI Sweden spokesperson told The Guardian<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhile the song appears on Spotify\u2019s own charts, it does not qualify for inclusion on the official chart under the current rules.\u201d<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Why Sweden disqualified the song<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The decision followed an investigation by investigative journalist Emanuel Karlsten, who revealed that the track was partly AI-generated. The song is registered to Danish music publisher Stella, where two of the credited rights holders work within the company\u2019s AI department. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Karlsten described the release as an \u201cexperiment\u201d that tests the limits of how audiences respond to artificial artists and AI-assisted music. It was that discovery that pushed IFPI Sweden to act:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOur rule is that if it is a song that is mainly AI-generated, it does not have the right to be on the top list.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>Ludvig Werber, IFPI Sweden\u2019s chief executive<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Stellar pushes back<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Stellar has strongly defended the track and its creative process. While the company confirmed that generative AI was used across both \u201cJacub\u2019s voice and parts of the music,\u201d Stellar stressed that humans were very much in the driving seat. It insists that it\u2019s a music company run by creative professionals \u201cfirst and foremost\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Stellar, the song was not just generated from a simple prompt. Instead, it claims the track required significant \u201ctime, energy, and dedication\u201d which was guided by humans.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe are passionate and experienced music professionals who have invested large amounts of time, energy and dedication in the songwriting and production of this release, and the creation has been a process that has been guided by clear artistic vision.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>Stellar<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The company also made a point of distancing itself from what many in the industry now refer to as \u2018AI slop\u2019. In fact, Stellar is against this kind of mass-produced, low-quality AI content that has been flooding platforms in recent times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bigger picture: AI music, charts, and transparency<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

AI music isn\u2019t going anywhere, and in 2026 the industry is still figuring out how to deal with AI. That\u2019s particularly the case for AI-assisted tracks and how they should be labeled, regulated, or ranked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Some platforms are taking a hard stance. Direct-to-fan music platform, Bandcamp, recently confirmed<\/a> it won\u2019t allow any AI-generated music on its platform. Now, Sweden\u2019s official charts are drawing their own line too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
Bandcamp puts human artists first as it clamps down on AI music<\/a><\/blockquote>